Contents
Catalog Links

Stone Child College Student Assessment of General Education Learner Outcomes (GELO) and Performance

A student-directed critical reflection and review of general education learner outcomes and educational performance

Name:

Course:

Date:

Instructor:

General Education Learner Outcome:

  1. General Education Learner Outcome (GELO)
    • The GELO for this course WAS or WAS NOT (please circle one) meaningful to my education because:
    • The GELO WAS or WAS NOT (please circle one) relevant to the course because:
    • The GELO WAS or WAS NOT (please circle one) well supported through instruction and assignments. Please explain:
  2. Educational Performance
    • I expected the following from this course:
    • I did the following to ensure success in this course: (for example, attended class consistently, submitted timely and quality assignments, used feedback from the instructor, asked critical questions, participated in group work or classroom discussions, etc.)
    • I gained the following skills from this course that will assist me in my educational or career goals:
    • I gained the following information from this course that will assist me in my educational or career goals:
    • In regards to my learning and performance in this course, I feel_____ because:
  3. Applicability of GLEO to Service, Culture, and Continued Growth
    • Please identify ways in which the GELO will contribute to the good of those you will serve in your career.
    • Please identify ways in which the GELO will support your capacity to serve your culture.
    • Please identify ways in which you will continue to grow and learn more deeply about the GELO.
Essential Elements 0 Unacceptable 1 Developing 2 Proficient 3 Exemplary
Students will write a minimum of 3 paragraphs using the guided template, “Student Assessment of Outcomes and Performance” and thoughtfully respond to each question or statement in the 3 main areas: General Education Learner Outcome, Educational Performance, and Commitment to Continuous Learning and the Content. Unacceptable (0) is defined to be a level of work lacking clear demonstration of more than one of the essential elements being assessed. Developing (1) is defined to be a level of work that indicates all essential elements have been demonstrated, but one of those critical elements are underdeveloped to the degree it would be prudent for the candidate to receive additional preparation in the underdeveloped area. Proficient (2) is defined to be a level of performance that indicates all assessed elements have been developed to the degree that it is reasonable to conclude the candidate has succeeded in meeting the stated expectations of the assessment. Exemplary (3) is defined to be a proficient candidate who has developed beyond expectations in 50% or more of the essential elements being assessed.